Mr Torrie Wilson wrote:Host: Two extra mods. Smash Awards 08. Chr1s rejoining.
Contestant: Um, things that are unnecessary?
Host: Correct!
What's everyones beef with me around here??
Mr Torrie Wilson wrote:Host: Two extra mods. Smash Awards 08. Chr1s rejoining.
Contestant: Um, things that are unnecessary?
Host: Correct!
chr1s wrote:Mr Torrie Wilson wrote:Host: Two extra mods. Smash Awards 08. Chr1s rejoining.
Contestant: Um, things that are unnecessary?
Host: Correct!
What's everyones beef with me around here??
chr1s wrote:Er? What now?
Big Dave wrote:I thought it was becasue he's a non-entity cunt.
chr1s wrote:Big Dave wrote:I thought it was becasue he's a non-entity cunt.
I believe its spelt because not becasue, oh yea new low, even for me!!
'Dub wrote:Aaah I remember the days when a bit of light hearted fun like this could go without being split... now it's deemed an argument and lost in the asylum forever.
I consider it prejudice, ch1s. Sue them. All of them.
chr1s wrote:'Dub wrote:Aaah I remember the days when a bit of light hearted fun like this could go without being split... now it's deemed an argument and lost in the asylum forever.
I consider it prejudice, ch1s. Sue them. All of them.
I couldn't agree with you more.
Garibaldi wrote:My main priority with separating things was to ensure that the real purpose of that thread wasn't lost. If we want any new members to join, then traditionally they check the top section and threads like that to get a feel for the place - if they see something like that then they're likely to be less than enamoured.
Plus I could aslo see an "everyone v Chr1s" situation brewing and thought that I't be best to move that aside. There's general ribbing between 1 or 2 members, but across the forum every post against him seemed to be from someone different. When you start with "Nonentity cunt" that early in something like this, then it's not far from seriously escalating.
For the record, welcome back Chr1s.
And the Mods thing I shall address elsewhere.
Garibaldi wrote:Plus I could aslo see an "everyone v Chr1s" situation brewing
The Stig wrote:Garibaldi wrote:Plus I could aslo see an "everyone v Chr1s" situation brewing
I was on the side of Chr1s.
The Stig wrote:Garibaldi wrote:Plus I could aslo see an "everyone v Chr1s" situation brewing
I was on the side of Chr1s.
We have started over and you a now a noob, hence the abuse.chr1s wrote:Yea why is everyone against me here? Since I've came back I haven't bothered anyone, surely we're all allowed to start over?
ShowStealer wrote:We have started over and you a now a noob, hence the abuse.chr1s wrote:Yea why is everyone against me here? Since I've came back I haven't bothered anyone, surely we're all allowed to start over?
P.S. FUCK YOU!
chr1s wrote:Yea why is everyone against me here? Since I've came back I haven't bothered anyone, surely we're all allowed to start over?
Mr Torrie Wilson wrote:chr1s wrote:Yea why is everyone against me here? Since I've came back I haven't bothered anyone, surely we're all allowed to start over?
I think you're thinking of Buddhism.
chr1s wrote:ShowStealer wrote:We have started over and you a now a noob, hence the abuse.chr1s wrote:Yea why is everyone against me here? Since I've came back I haven't bothered anyone, surely we're all allowed to start over?
P.S. FUCK YOU!
Oh whatever, go steal a shoe!!
|
|