Cliques?

Do we really need to go back to having ciques on here?

disco stu wrote:Do we really need to go back to having ciques on here?

Huh?

What the fuck is he talking about? What Clique?

Maybe he means Shaun and the Smash Knight?

disco stu wrote:Do we really need to go back to having ciques on here?

I was thinking the same thing myself. Can't we all just get along?

chr1s wrote:

disco stu wrote:Do we really need to go back to having ciques on here?

I was thinking the same thing myself. Can't we all just get along?

I used to like you.

Hey at least someone did!!

IOV wrote:Maybe he means Shaun and the Smash Knight?

He means BOD, Garibaldi and Sweatsock (and the valet, JK)

ShowStealer wrote:

IOV wrote:Maybe he means Shaun and the Smash Knight?

He means BOD, Garibaldi and Sweatsock (and the valet, JK)

I actually thought he was talking about 'Dub & The Stig.

Thats why your a mod.

Split into here so as not disrupt the initial thread.

Care to expand on your clique comment Stu? Also, why post it in that particular thread?

chr1s wrote:

disco stu wrote:Do we really need to go back to having ciques on here?

I was thinking the same thing myself. Can't we all just get along?

Not likely. The latest trend is that when you say something another member disagrees with they follow you all over the board for the sake of hounding you. Most of the time they contribute nothing to the debate or discussion or the thread's purpose, they just want to stir.

ShowStealer wrote:

IOV wrote:Maybe he means Shaun and the Smash Knight?

He means BOD, Garibaldi and Sweatsock (and the valet, JK)

If you remember, they were in the same clique as Inno, so therefore it didn't count as one.

Lest we forget that you and Stu are friends, so that must be a clique too.

I've spoken to Stu on MSN...does that make him a MSN Clique member?

Can someone let me in their clique please?

Sweatsock wrote:

ShowStealer wrote:

IOV wrote:Maybe he means Shaun and the Smash Knight?

He means BOD, Garibaldi and Sweatsock (and the valet, JK)

I actually thought he was talking about 'Dub & The Stig.

I don't even know 'Dub apart from his posts on here...

Sweatsock wrote:Split into here so as not disrupt the initial thread.

Care to expand on your clique comment Stu? Also, why post it in that particular thread?

More than anything i was pissed at seeing another perfectly good thread get another retared The Stig Vs Anyone in a pointless bickering match reference (Seedubs post). I got the arse said something stupid and ironicly derailed the thread myself.

disco stu wrote:

Sweatsock wrote:Split into here so as not disrupt the initial thread.

Care to expand on your clique comment Stu? Also, why post it in that particular thread?

More than anything i was pissed at seeing another perfectly good thread get another retared The Stig Vs Anyone in a pointless bickering match reference (Seedubs post). I got the arse said something stupid and ironicly derailed the thread myself.

So because I jokingly suggested a forum feud as the best feud of the wrestling year, you thought I was ruining the thread? Isn't that jumping the gun a bit? Some would consider that humour.

yeah possibly, i appologise.

disco stu wrote:Thats why your a mod.

We have mods?

Yes and ironicly your not one.

disco stu wrote:Yes and ironicly your not one.

Hm... Interesting. I have noticed the lack of power to lock threads in my life in the recent months. Perhaps a bloody coup will be necessary, or, at the very least, enjoyable.

disco stu wrote:

Sweatsock wrote:Split into here so as not disrupt the initial thread.

Care to expand on your clique comment Stu? Also, why post it in that particular thread?

More than anything i was pissed at seeing another perfectly good thread get another retared The Stig Vs Anyone in a pointless bickering match reference (Seedubs post). I got the arse said something stupid and ironicly derailed the thread myself.

Whenever there has been a fued of the year thread, forum members have always been mentioned, well atleast in the 6.5 years I've been posting they have.

Mtank325 wrote:

disco stu wrote:Yes and ironicly your not one.

Hm... Interesting. I have noticed the lack of power to lock threads in my life in the recent months. Perhaps a bloody coup will be necessary, or, at the very least, enjoyable.

A bloody coup? Hmmm, sounds interesting. Need an extra pair of hands? There's nothing like bloodshed on a cold winters morning.

No need for blood! No need for .... QUICK PUT UP THE SHUTTERS AND RAISE THE DRAWBRIDGE!



It's not a clique thing with me getting friends to mod. I wanted people I'm comfortable with to start with, plus with 20,000 posts between the three of us, we kinda know all the Smashers of old. My new job is still taking more of my attention than I'd like, and I reallty want to help Smash take off again this year, so to carry out big plans I need a bit of help. Sweatsock particularly has been on here a lot since, both visibly and behind the scenes.

And I don't mean fecking awards and the like, they're just to jazz things up a little. We've already been having good chats behind the scenes about a few ideas, from publicity to competitions to a main site to draw people in.

I did actualy approach someone else to mix things up, but we discussed it and his contributions to the forum were likely to be much reduced for a while so we agreed it wasn't the best time.

It's not going to become a police state, it's all for practical reasons, boys!

Dont see the problem really.

The place runs itself usually as it is quite mellow and chilled out.

Garibaldi...I salute you but I do miss the Rowan Atkinson avatar.

Garibaldi wrote:I wanted people I'm comfortable with to start with, plus with 20,000 posts between the three of us, we kinda know all the Smashers of old.

By that logic, EdgeRulez should be running the whole thing... which wouldn't be good.

The Stig wrote:

Garibaldi wrote:I wanted people I'm comfortable with to start with, plus with 20,000 posts between the three of us, we kinda know all the Smashers of old.

By that logic, EdgeRulez should be running the whole thing... which wouldn't be good.

Yeah, but I got off my ass and paid to do it

I thought that the only cliques on the old smash were the possibly fictional MSN Clique and the Glasgow gets smashed crowd.

Garibaldi wrote:

No need for blood! No need for .... QUICK PUT UP THE SHUTTERS AND RAISE THE DRAWBRIDGE!



It's not a clique thing with me getting friends to mod. I wanted people I'm comfortable with to start with, plus with 20,000 posts between the three of us, we kinda know all the Smashers of old. My new job is still taking more of my attention than I'd like, and I reallty want to help Smash take off again this year, so to carry out big plans I need a bit of help. Sweatsock particularly has been on here a lot since, both visibly and behind the scenes.

And I don't mean fecking awards and the like, they're just to jazz things up a little. We've already been having good chats behind the scenes about a few ideas, from publicity to competitions to a main site to draw people in.

I did actualy approach someone else to mix things up, but we discussed it and his contributions to the forum were likely to be much reduced for a while so we agreed it wasn't the best time.

It's not going to become a police state, it's all for practical reasons, boys!

You could just say INNO.

Big Dave wrote:I thought that the only cliques on the old smash were the possibly fictional MSN Clique and the Glasgow gets smashed crowd.

I'm sure the "MSN Clique" was just something made up by EdgeRulez so he could play the victim role. The GGS Clique definitely existed (and still does) though.